When I was in high school, I took an amazing course: History of Religion. For a public high school in a non-Bible belt state, this was pretty revolutionary. But as was pointed out to us by our teacher -- the love-her or hate-her Mrs. Penn -- it wasn't about religion. It was about studying the history of how religion developed.
It was one of the most interesting classes I took. You were required to attend two religious services not your own, so I got to sit in on a Catholic mass and a Quaker meeting (after which I met David Byrne's mother and had some of her banana bread!) and bring in someone to discuss your religion. If they started to preach, though, they'd have to leave. It was brilliant, and spurred my interest in studying the origins of religion -- I minored in it in college. And I'm not a particularly religious person.
That said, this fries my weenies. At what point did Bible Study become an OK elective course? The "National Council on Bible Curriculum in Public Schools"? At what point did that happen? And more importantly, the main text to be studied "promoted creationism and taught that the Constitution was based on Scripture."
Please. Everyone mess with Texas, immediately. Few states have needed such messing around with before.
From the NY Times:
December 22, 2005
Texas District Adopts Disputed Text on Bible Study
By BARBARA NOVOVITCH
Correction Appended
ODESSA, Tex., Dec. 21 -Trustees of the Ector County Independent School District here decided, 4 to 2, on Tuesday night that high school students would use a course published by the National Council on Bible Curriculum in Public Schools for studying the Bible in history and literature.
The council is a religious advocacy group in Greensboro, N.C., and has the backing of the Eagle Forum and Focus on the Family, two conservative organizations.
The vote on the disputed textbook, for an elective Bible study course, has not ended the matter. Critics say the book promotes fundamentalist Protestant Christianity.
The district superintendent, Wendell Sollis, said Wednesday that he had recommended the textbook over a newer one by the Bible Literacy Project, published this year through the Freedom Forum and an ecumenical group of scholars and endorsed by a group of religious organizations.
"I felt like the National Council was a better fit for Odessa, because they're on several campuses here in Texas and because of their longevity," Mr. Sollis said.
David Newman, a professor of English at Odessa College, said he planned to sue the district because the curriculum advocated a fundamentalist Christian point of view.
The school board president, Randy Rives, said of the curriculum, which uses the King James Version of the Bible: "If you're going to teach something, it's better to use the source. I have complete confidence that we can teach this within the parameters of the law."
Professor Newman said, "If the beliefs of others don't match theirs, then the beliefs of others are irrelevant."
Last summer, the Texas Freedom Network, which promotes religious freedoms, asked a biblical scholar at Southern Methodist University, Mark A. Chancey, to examine the council course. Dr. Chancey said it had factual errors, promoted creationism and taught that the Constitution was based on Scripture.
A district trustee here, Carol Gregg, said she favored the Bible Literacy Project because it was "more user friendly toward teachers" and "more respectful of minority and majority" religious views.
Unlike the competing curriculum, it mentions several versions of the Bible.
Correction: Dec. 24, 2005, Saturday:
An article on Thursday about a Texas school district's adopting a course published by the National Council on Bible Curriculum in Public Schools for studying the Bible in history and literature misstated the position of Focus on the Family, a conservative Christian group. Focus on the Family has not endorsed the council or its Bible curriculum.
No comments:
Post a Comment